Skip to content

Working with Remote Resources

Practice · Chapter 15

A remote employee performs work away from the office (telecommuting). Remote resources may be internal staff or outsourced from another organization. Architects should understand the benefits and challenges of non-co-located teams.

  • Employees tend to like remote work; it can improve morale and productivity via flexible options.
  • Employers find it easier to recruit and retain, saving on hiring and office space.
  • Outsourcing adds operational/recruitment cost savings, easier team scale-up/down, and a partner to share project risk.

Using remote resources effectively takes planning, experience, and a solid software development process. Done carelessly, it can lengthen projects and hurt quality.

ChallengeKey points
CommunicationTeleconferencing helps, but face-to-face is sometimes better; time-zone spread complicates meetings — be mindful when scheduling.
Cultural differencesWith cross-country teams, both sides should learn each other’s cultural norms to avoid misunderstandings and offense, maximizing clarity.
Impromptu meetingsHarder across time zones — a spontaneous chat may have to be scheduled for the next day. Upside: fewer interruptions means less context switching and higher productivity.
New employee onboardingTransferring technical and business knowledge remotely is harder; pair programming or a short on-site stint helps a new hire absorb culture, norms, and standards (and later train others).
Work qualityOutsourced work quality can vary and is harder to control; mitigate with established code-review and QA processes, feedback, and replacing underperformers.
Confidential company dataLimit exposure of confidential data to outside companies; mitigate via legal agreements and by masking/redacting/removing sensitive data and PII (names, SSNs, contact info).
  • Communication — cultural awareness and courteousness carry directly into remote collaboration.
  • Software Architect’s Handbook (Packt, 2018), Ch.15 “Working with remote resources”, pp. 1116-1124.